Ирвинг против Липштадт
Holocaust Denial on Trial, Appeal Judgment: Electronic Edition, by Lord Justice PillTable of Contents
|<< Conclusion on Auschwitz||< Background||Hitler's trial in 1924 an... >||Result >>|
The applicant's historiography
48. Under the heading "The specific criticisms made by the defendants of Irving's historiography", the judge set out (5.16 to 5.245) the submissions of the parties as to views expressed by the applicant on 18 events in the history of the Third Reich. The
49. judge's conclusions upon the submissions are set out at 13.9 to 13.50 of the judgment. At 13.51, as well as 13.9, the judge expressed general conclusions. Mr Davies has challenged those conclusions by making submissions upon the judge's consideration of the applicant's views upon some of the events of greater significance.