Irving v. Lipstadt
Holocaust Denial on Trial, Trial Transcripts, Day 23: Electronic Edition
Pages 231 - 235 of 237
|<< 1-5||< 226-230||236-237 >||236-237 >>|
1 A. [Professor Richard John Evans] Yes.
2 Q. [Mr Rampton] Can we then just look because Mr Irving, I think ----
3 MR JUSTICE GRAY: I am not sure I have the point on that. How
4does that help us to Heydrich's view about German
6 MR RAMPTON: What Professor Evans said in ----
7 MR JUSTICE GRAY: --- shops not to be set on fire?
8 MR RAMPTON: I am sorry.
9 MR JUSTICE GRAY: I just wondered how that cast any light on
10the 2.56 message.
11 MR RAMPTON: Because that also is a prohibition against the
12setting fire. It does not say any other kind of damage.
13The setting fire to Jewish shops.
14 MR JUSTICE GRAY: Yes, I see.
15 MR RAMPTON: This is synagogues: "synagogue fires only if
16there is no danger of the fire spreading to the
17surrounding buildings". Perhaps, my Lord, what one can --
18I should not really give evidence, but it is an argument
19rather than evidence -- assume is that since Heydrich had
20spoken of synagogue fires at 1.20, Opdenhoff, Hess's man,
21need only speak of shops at 2.56.
22 MR JUSTICE GRAY: Yes, I see.
23 MR RAMPTON: I do not know. The key word is obviously the
24"arson" word. (To the witness): If you would just
25glance at those four headings, Professor Evans ----
26 A. [Professor Richard John Evans] Yes.
1 Q. [Mr Rampton] --- in the Heydrich telex and then please turn finally on
2this topic to page 276 of Mr Irving's Goebbels book?
3 A. [Professor Richard John Evans] Yes.
4 Q. [Mr Rampton] At the bottom of the page we see this: "What of Himmler
5and Hitler? Both were totally unaware of what Goebbels
6had done until the synagogue next to Munich's Four Seasons
7Hotel set on fire around 1 a.m. Heydrich, Himmler's
8national chief of police, was relaxing down in the hotel
9bar; he hurried up to Himmler's room, then telexed
10instructions to all police authorities to restore law and
11order, protect Jews and Jewish property, and halt any
12ongoing incidents". I ask you this. Does that seem to
13you a fair and accurate reproduction of the substance of
14Heydrich's telex at 1.20 a.m.?
15 A. [Professor Richard John Evans] No, it does not, Mr Rampton.
16 Q. [Mr Rampton] If you look over the page, you will see that the footnote
17reference for 43 and I think it is on page 613 ----
18 A. [Professor Richard John Evans] 613, I have it.
19 Q. [Mr Rampton] It must be a wrong reference.
20 MR JUSTICE GRAY: Yes, it is.
21 MR RAMPTON: It is a wrong reference.
22 A. [Professor Richard John Evans] It should be 3051.
23 Q. [Mr Rampton] Yes.
24 A. [Professor Richard John Evans] We went through this.
25 Q. [Mr Rampton] Yes, we did, did we not. We have done the Heydrich
26telex. I am just going to go back momentarily to the
1Hess's office telex at 2.56. That is further down page
2277. At 2.56 a.m. you see that, the end of a line?
3 A. [Professor Richard John Evans] Yes. I just say that the wrong reference is obviously
4just a slip of pen on Mr Irving's part.
5 Q. [Mr Rampton] Mr Irving has accepted that and the right reference should
7 A. [Professor Richard John Evans] The reference to Karl Wolff's evidence has nothing to do
8with what is in the text. It is simply an additional
10 Q. [Mr Rampton] I understand that. That was my mistake, a slight
11diversion. Can we go down about quarter of the way down
13 A. [Professor Richard John Evans] Yes.
14 Q. [Mr Rampton] We have a sentence which begins towards the end of the
15line at 2.56 am. Do you see that?
16 A. [Professor Richard John Evans] Yes.
17 Q. [Mr Rampton] At 2.56 a.m. Rudolf Hess's staff also began cabling,
18telephoning, and radioing instructions to gauleiters and
19police authorities around the nation to halt the
20madness". Again, does that seem to you a fair and
21accurate account of what was in that Opdenhof telegram?
22 A. [Professor Richard John Evans] No. It is total and obviously deliberate perversion of
23the contents of the telegram.
24 Q. [Mr Rampton] If you would like to turn to page 613 to note 49?
25 A. [Professor Richard John Evans] Yes.
26 Q. [Mr Rampton] I can tell you that the reference is ND 3063-PS, which is
1in fact the Nazi party court report of 13th February 1939
2we first looked at.
3 A. [Professor Richard John Evans] Exactly right.
4 Q. [Mr Rampton] Now, Professor, you will need a file called J1, tab 3,
6 A. [Professor Richard John Evans] Yes, I have it.
7 Q. [Mr Rampton] Thank you very much. I just want to ask you, this is the
8famous or infamous Hitler Himmler telephone log of 1st
10 A. [Professor Richard John Evans] Yes.
11 Q. [Mr Rampton] You do not need your report for this at all. This is a
12question of German language. Do you remember that
13Mr Irving translated or transcribed this entry as (you
14will forgive my German) Verwaltungs Fuhrer der SS Juden
15zu bleiben, except he did not transcribe the first part?
16 A. [Professor Richard John Evans] That is right, Juden zu bleiben.
17 Q. [Mr Rampton] If it had said Verwaltungs Fuhrer der SS Juden zu bleiben
18in German, would it make any sense?
19 MR JUSTICE GRAY: No, he said it would not.
20 MR RAMPTON: He said that, did he?
21 A. [Professor Richard John Evans] No, it would not make any sense.
22 Q. [Mr Rampton] The second question is a history question rather than a
23German question. As it stands in its correct form
24Verwaltungs Fuhrer der SS haben zu bleiben, is it an entry
25of any significance, historically?
26 A. [Professor Richard John Evans] I suppose it might be, if you were writing a history of
1the Verwaltungs Fuhrer der SS.
2 Q. [Mr Rampton] Yes.
3 A. [Professor Richard John Evans] But in the overall scheme of things it does not seem to me
4of shattering importance. Juden zu bleiben, of course,
5taken by itself, is not grammatically possible really.
6 Q. [Mr Rampton] I suppose he might have just written down Verwaltungs
7Fuhrer der SS as a sort of isolated, what Mr Irving calls
8an orphan. It is difficult to see, I suppose, what it
9might have meant, is it?
10 A. [Professor Richard John Evans] No. It just would have meant you can see plenty further
12 Q. [Mr Rampton] Yes.
13 A. [Professor Richard John Evans] Of just notes to himself really. But clearly it is the
14indentation which is reproduced on the original, the next
15page but not on this transcript on the second line, which
16is the key.
17 MR RAMPTON: Yes, you made that point. Thank you. Finally
18this, and I am afraid it is because it is late and it is
19your last question, it is a little bit cheap. You
20remember the dispute on page 400 of your report?
21 A. [Professor Richard John Evans] Yes.
22 Q. [Mr Rampton] About the way in which you translated in the third line
23Dr Goebbels' diary entry of 27th March 1942, "in general
24one may conclude that 60 per cent of them must be
25liquidated". Do you remember that?
26 A. [Professor Richard John Evans] Yes. That was today.
|<< 1-5||< 226-230||236-237 >||236-237 >>|